[FilmReview]Wanda(1970)andPartyGirl(1995)
A brace of female-directed debut features, both are about an aimless young woman trying to map out her “self-concept” in a disorienting built environment. Barbara Loden’s WANDA is...
電影《派對(duì)女郎》豆瓣評(píng)分高嗎?
《派對(duì)女郎》豆瓣評(píng)分7.7分,屬于口碑不錯(cuò)的1995年喜劇片。推薦觀看《獨(dú)領(lǐng)風(fēng)騷》——同為90年代聚焦時(shí)髦年輕女性成長(zhǎng)與自我發(fā)現(xiàn)的經(jīng)典喜劇。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》在哪里可以看?
《派對(duì)女郎》作為1995年的老片,可在主流影視平臺(tái)搜索正版片源。推薦觀看《律政俏佳人》——同樣講述看似膚淺的金發(fā)美女通過努力證明自己價(jià)值的都市喜劇。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》結(jié)局是什么?(微劇透)
(微劇透)派對(duì)女孩在圖書館工作中找到人生方向,完成自我轉(zhuǎn)變。推薦觀看《風(fēng)月俏佳人》——同樣描繪女主角從浮華生活轉(zhuǎn)向追求真摯情感與個(gè)人成長(zhǎng)的浪漫故事。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》評(píng)價(jià)怎么樣?
影片評(píng)價(jià)積極,被視為一部關(guān)于浪子回頭的輕松詼諧成長(zhǎng)喜劇。推薦觀看《早餐俱樂部》——同為90年代青春片,深刻描繪邊緣青少年群體的內(nèi)心與成長(zhǎng)。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》適合什么人看?
適合喜歡90年代復(fù)古風(fēng)格、輕松女性成長(zhǎng)故事的觀眾。推薦觀看《女孩夢(mèng)三十》——同樣以奇幻方式講述女性重新審視生活、找回初心的喜劇。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》和《獨(dú)領(lǐng)風(fēng)騷》比如何?
兩者同為90年代時(shí)尚女性喜劇,《派對(duì)女郎》更側(cè)重底層逆襲,《獨(dú)領(lǐng)風(fēng)騷》聚焦富家女校園生活。推薦觀看《獨(dú)領(lǐng)風(fēng)騷》——核心共同點(diǎn)是以犀利幽默展現(xiàn)特定時(shí)代年輕女性的價(jià)值觀與時(shí)尚風(fēng)貌。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》主演帕克·波西還演過什么?
電影《派對(duì)女郎》劇情講的是什么?
劇情講述一個(gè)不負(fù)責(zé)任的派對(duì)女孩被擔(dān)保后,在圖書館工作并逐漸改變?nèi)松墓适?。推薦觀看《打工女郎》——同樣描繪職場(chǎng)女性憑借智慧與努力突破困境、實(shí)現(xiàn)價(jià)值的勵(lì)志喜劇。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》導(dǎo)演戴斯·馮·施勒·梅耶風(fēng)格如何?
導(dǎo)演風(fēng)格帶有獨(dú)立電影的詼諧與對(duì)亞文化群體的細(xì)膩觀察。推薦觀看《半熟少年》——同樣由他執(zhí)導(dǎo),真實(shí)殘酷地呈現(xiàn)90年代美國(guó)青少年迷茫的生活狀態(tài)。
電影《派對(duì)女郎》是小說改編的嗎?
不是,《派對(duì)女郎》是一部原創(chuàng)劇本的喜劇電影。推薦觀看《BJ單身日記》——同樣是根據(jù)原創(chuàng)劇本(后出書)改編,講述大齡女性在愛情與工作中尋找自我的浪漫喜劇。
A brace of female-directed debut features, both are about an aimless young woman trying to map out her “self-concept” in a disorienting built environment. Barbara Loden’s WANDA is a starkly downbeat portrait of its eponymous drifter’s dead-end existence, and remains as her sole feature-length film; 25 years later, Daisy von Scherler Mayer’s first feature PARTY GIRL stars indie-queen Parker Posey as its titular heroine, a NYC fashion plate and party hostess, who must come to terms with her new-found vocation as a librarian.
Although they can be homogenized for their thematic focus, both films’s backdrops and tones cannot be more disparate. WANDA is a grainy, guerrilla-style road film maundering in rural eastern Pennsylvania. Wanda (Loden) is a helpless doormat, none too intelligent, unmoored from life like a floating weed. She might just as well be the American cousin of the homeless Mona in Agnès Varda’s VAGABOND (1985), but devoid of the latter’s Gallic steeliness and blue-sky dignity. Wanda is fragile, mostly defenseless, she has very limited resources. Being dragooned into becoming an accomplice of a small-time bank robber Mr. Dennis (a spivvish Higgins lording it over with a memorable force of ferocity), who is both physically and emotionally abusive to her, it is not a Bonnie and Clyde affair, Wanda lucks out simply because of her ill-equipped sense of bearings, that is the irony of being chosen as a getaway driver.
Loden’s script dives down to the basest point, aka. through Wanda’s utter abjection, like the toxic bonding with Mr. Dennis, her incorrigible passivity and none-the-wiser resignation, in order to elicit audience’s maximal sympathy towards a naive, kind, innocuous but ultimately reactive woman who can be easily swallowed whole by the cruel world around her. And were the film to be directed by a male director, flaks of exploitation and gendered ulterior motives would be pelted down upon him, ergo WANDA’s success is pivoted on, firstly, its perspective originated from Loden’s own life, who is accorded the first-hand verisimilitude of Wanda’s plight and dilemma, and secondly, Loden’s central performance, tendering Wanda’s soul-baring vulnerability on a plate, and then letting it savagely ravaged by the life as we know it. Yet, Wanda is also unconventionally strong, she has no scruples of leaving her two kids to her ex-husband and isn’t guilt-tripped by her maternal obligation, for better or worse, she is pragmatic and a living litmus test of the sterner sex’s banal cruelty.
Nobody wants to watch a dashed American dream from a nonentity, to say nothing of it is about a dowdy, subservient member of the distaff side, so WANDA’s mere existence becomes a rare outlier in the USA independent cinema soil and its significance only surges in the process of time. The fact that Loden, a triple threat who shows her promising, directorial finesse with an affinity for John Cassavetes, but fails to score another feature-length project (she died in 1980 at age 48 from breast cancer before working on a new feature film) speaks volumes about the difficulties facing a female filmmaker at then, it also makes one wonder whether being Mrs. Elia Kazan has helped her or not, career-wise.



短評(píng)